Settings and activity
35 results found
-
6 votes
Please let us know more about this request by voting or adding comments
An error occurred while saving the comment 
David Hill
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
Our team is looking for additional feedback around this idea.
David Hill
supported this idea
·
-
12 votes
Our team is exploring this idea, please share your comments and feedback so we can continue our discovery.
David Hill
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesDavid Hill
supported this idea
·
-
10 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment David Hill
commented
Not a huge issue with internal forms but very important with any customer-facing ones. The norm in the industry seems to be free accounts have the Form-company branding but paid accounts do not. If we make GoFormz public forms available to our customers, they will assume we are doing so "on the cheap" and not paying for an account. Which we are. We look less professional than we are.
This applies to the marketing banner at the top of the public form and the marketing on the post-submission page.
I also have an issue with paying to market your service. Compare to JotForm.
David Hill
supported this idea
·
-
16 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment David Hill
commented
A feature to print a Template for documentation purposes that listed all the field properties and especially the calculations on Default / Visible / Required fields. Currently there is no way to review all the calculations to see how they interact. Not a big issue on simple forms, but would be a big help on complicated forms.
David Hill
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesDavid Hill
supported this idea
·
-
19 votes
Our team is looking for additional feedback around this idea.
David Hill
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesDavid Hill
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesDavid Hill
supported this idea
·
-
39 votesDavid Hill
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesDavid Hill
supported this idea
·
-
8 votes
We're exploring pain points and opportunities for Permissions, Users, and Groups. Please share your thoughts on how this idea would impact your experience.
An error occurred while saving the comment David Hill
commented
In addition to the option to allow management permission to Datasources, I'd like to be able to authorize certain users to be able to maintain the data in a Datasource. Ideally at a Datasource level, but global would be better than today. I want users to be able to update the data without giving them the ability to add and delete Datasources, or change the Datasource schema. We just had a major issue when a user who was maintaining the data accidentally deleted all the Datasources and broke a lot of forms. Fortunately, GoFormz support were able to recover the Datasources, but more granular permissions would have protected us better.
David Hill
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesDavid Hill
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment David Hill
commented
I have multiple groups of users and some datasources are relevant to some groups and not others. All the users need to work offline though. Some of the datasources are large and they take a while to sync, during which time the iPads can be not very responsive. It would be nice if I could assign datasources to groups, and they only downloaded for those groups.
-
2 votesDavid Hill
shared this idea
·
-
10 votesDavid Hill
supported this idea
·
-
9 votesDavid Hill
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesDavid Hill
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesDavid Hill
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesDavid Hill
supported this idea
·
We would like to build a form based public form from our CRM system (via APIs) that contains a Proposal, retrieve the Public Form URL (via API) and include that link in an email to our client. The client could click the link and accept/reject the proposal, and also sign the proposal if they accepted it.